ABSENT
No usable answer or evidence.
Project Shadow 1.0.1 contains no Myth package. Generic Myth v0.2.0 and Full-Canon Myth v0.3.5 are separate optional companions; both default off, neither is required by R1, and neither can authorize action or change an R1 result. Civic QA remains self-service and unofficial; publication transfers no authority and is not operational deployment, efficacy, safety, certification, a legal-compliance finding, permission to act, or a global green.
One civic lifecycle / six distinct public doors
Project Shadowinstruments + testsPBHPpausesCivic QAinspectsARMrepairsThe RecordremembersALMSIVIpreserves optional originQA-04Public scorecard
Use the scorecard on a candidate plan, agency program, public contract, proposed law, institutional process, or AI deployment. The total aids comparison; it never overrides a material authority, rights, recourse, or severe-harm failure.
Every score needs a short rationale and source. Unknown is not zero; mark it unknown, describe its decision impact, and keep the inspection open.
No usable answer or evidence.
A principle, promise, or control is asserted.
Some mechanism and evidence exist, with material gaps.
Authority, implementation, safeguard, evidence, and test are visible.
Is the power being exercised lawful, explicit, bounded, visible, and matched to the stated purpose?
Are decision-bearing claims sourced, current, reproducible, uncertainty-labeled, and open to counterevidence?
Who waits, pays, proves, travels, discloses, complies, or loses access—and can they realistically complete the process?
Are notice, explanation, privacy, due process, appeal, remedy, and recovery usable by the people most affected?
Do staffing, funding, procurement, training, interfaces, and operational dependencies support the promised result?
Are data use, objective, model limits, permissions, testing, human ownership, monitoring, stop authority, and retirement conditions visible?
Are success, harm, quality, access, and unintended effects measured across groups without hiding people in aggregate averages?
Can evidence change the system, is recurrence prevented, and does the public receive a complete record even when the result is poor?