Skip to content
PROJECT SHADOW 1.0.1 · CORRECTED R1 REFERENCE · PRELIVE · 2026-08-17

Project Shadow 1.0.1 contains no Myth package. Generic Myth v0.2.0 and Full-Canon Myth v0.3.5 are separate optional companions; both default off, neither is required by R1, and neither can authorize action or change an R1 result. Civic QA remains self-service and unofficial; publication transfers no authority and is not operational deployment, efficacy, safety, certification, a legal-compliance finding, permission to act, or a global green.

CIVIC QAPublic systems inspection
ECOSYSTEMCIVIC QA

One civic lifecycle / six distinct public doors

Project Shadowinstruments + testsPBHPpausesCivic QAinspectsARMrepairsThe RecordremembersALMSIVIpreserves optional origin
Start an inspection

QA-02Inspection standards

A standard should tell you what to look for, what fails, and what proves repair.

These standards apply across institutions, policies, programs, political promises, procurement, and automated systems. Context changes the test depth; public consequence keeps the evidence and recourse floor intact.

TWELVE PUBLIC QUALITY STANDARDS

Inspect the mechanism, not the confidence.

Each standard must be operational enough to produce evidence, a finding when it fails, and a verification test after correction.

S-01

Purpose is explicit

The stated purpose, public value, affected population, prohibited uses, and boundaries can be tested against actual operation.

TEST · EVIDENCE · FINDING · CAPA · VERIFY
S-02

Authority is traceable

A reader can follow legal, policy, budget, contract, and delegated authority to one accountable owner.

TEST · EVIDENCE · FINDING · CAPA · VERIFY
S-03

Claims reveal their state

Observed facts, verified facts, inference, hypothesis, estimates, and unknowns do not collapse into one voice.

TEST · EVIDENCE · FINDING · CAPA · VERIFY
S-04

Burden is measured least-powerful-first

The inspection begins with people least able to refuse, appeal, wait, exit, or recover.

TEST · EVIDENCE · FINDING · CAPA · VERIFY
S-05

Rights survive implementation

Notice, explanation, privacy, due process, accessibility, challenge, and remedy work in practice.

TEST · EVIDENCE · FINDING · CAPA · VERIFY
S-06

Automation never invents authority

Data and models remain bounded by legitimate purpose, explicit permission, independent testing, human ownership, and an external stop.

TEST · EVIDENCE · FINDING · CAPA · VERIFY
S-07

A safer Door remains open

High-consequence action is reversible, staged, constrained, or delayed when evidence and recovery are inadequate.

TEST · EVIDENCE · FINDING · CAPA · VERIFY
S-08

A finding names the mechanism

The deviation identifies the recurrent condition, not merely the nearest person or visible error.

TEST · EVIDENCE · FINDING · CAPA · VERIFY
S-09

Correction includes prevention

The current harm is addressed and the incentive, workflow, control, authority, or dependency that reproduces it changes.

TEST · EVIDENCE · FINDING · CAPA · VERIFY
S-10

Effectiveness is independently testable

The threshold, evidence, reviewer, time window, and failure trigger exist before closure.

TEST · EVIDENCE · FINDING · CAPA · VERIFY
S-11

Correction history is preserved

The public can see what changed, why, when, and which downstream conclusions were reopened.

TEST · EVIDENCE · FINDING · CAPA · VERIFY
S-12

The receipt outlives the announcement

Sources, decisions, findings, dissent, owners, actions, tests, results, and open questions remain inspectable.

TEST · EVIDENCE · FINDING · CAPA · VERIFY
EIGHT REPEATABLE DIMENSIONS

The same inspection lens, across different systems.

The standard set defines the floor. These dimensions organize the evidence and expose where a policy or system fails in operation.

01 / AUTH

Authority & mandate

Is the power being exercised lawful, explicit, bounded, visible, and matched to the stated purpose?

Statute, rule, delegation, contract, budget authority, decision owner
02 / EVID

Evidence & claim integrity

Are decision-bearing claims sourced, current, reproducible, uncertainty-labeled, and open to counterevidence?

Source ledger, methodology, baseline, competing account, correction trail
03 / BURD

Access & burden

Who waits, pays, proves, travels, discloses, complies, or loses access—and can they realistically complete the process?

Process map, completion data, wait times, language/disability access, burden distribution
04 / RITE

Rights & recourse

Are notice, explanation, privacy, due process, appeal, remedy, and recovery usable by the people most affected?

Notices, appeal path, reversal time, legal safeguards, outcome of challenges
05 / CAPA

Delivery & capacity

Do staffing, funding, procurement, training, interfaces, and operational dependencies support the promised result?

Implementation plan, staffing, service levels, incident log, backlog, vendor obligations
06 / DATA

Data, AI & automation

Are data use, objective, model limits, permissions, testing, human ownership, monitoring, stop authority, and retirement conditions visible?

Model/system card, data lineage, TEVV, authorization envelope, override and incident logs
07 / MEAS

Measurement & distribution

Are success, harm, quality, access, and unintended effects measured across groups without hiding people in aggregate averages?

Prewritten metrics, denominators, sampling, subgroup results, error and recovery rates
08 / CORR

Correction & public accountability

Can evidence change the system, is recurrence prevented, and does the public receive a complete record even when the result is poor?

CAPA owner, trigger, due date, verification plan, public receipt, correction history
REQUIRED OUTPUTReport each dimension separately. A critical failure is never averaged away.